The debate on the backtestability of expected shortfall (ES) is almost as old as the risk measure itself. Despite warnings from prominent quants that the measure was unsuitable because no backtest ...
Recent results have shown backtests of expected shortfall (ES) are necessarily approximated, in the sense that they are unavoidably sensitive to possible errors in the prediction of value-at-risk.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results