Understand how mainframe automation testing works, the various benefits it offers, the latest trends and what lies ahead in ...

The average speed of automated testing is about five times that of its manual counterpart. This impacts your delivery velocity, deadlines, team dynamics, stress, and employee burn-out.

When automated tests are performed, very little human intervention is required. In turn, the test script can only act as it is configured. So sometimes script can omit mistakes that would be obvious ...

Before AI Before AI was introduced to automation testing, quality assurance was slower with a mix of manual and automatic processes. In the beginning, software was tested using a collection of ...

Automated testing is an integral part of the continuous delivery pipeline. Despite its benefits, in reality most organizations still use outdated manual testing processes. In one survey by XBOsoft ...

Find out whether automation works better than manual concrete testing in the construction industry.

To do this, consider some of the issues that manual testing exposes. For organizations still running tests manually, automation enables a level of consistency in the testing process.

Manual testing taps into human intuition and creativity. Unlike automated tests that rigidly follow scripts, manual testers can veer off predictable paths, discovering edge cases and subtle bugs.

A new study from Kobiton found nearly 100% of software testers use automation, and managers prefer new hires with automation experience.

Automated testing initiatives still lag behind in many organizations as increasingly complex testing environments are met with a lack of skilled personnel to set up tests.